Skip to main content

How to Think

Moving an arm and thinking about moving an arm are two vastly different things. Even thinking about thinking about moving an arm is a natural thing to do even if reading it is very odd. Now the hard part, how to you design thinking? The deliberate process of simulating scenarios to either logical or illogical ends would seem like a great fit for computers that can do millions of calculations a second. The slow an deliberate winding down a thought path seems to be the missing link to truely intelligent machines.




We are very good at making machines. Even more so machines that actually produce things and have purpose. Since the earliest primitive forms of man, our tools are defined by their use. Or more aptly by the end result they achieve. So what is the end result of smart machines? To drive our cars, build our structures, do the heavy lifting and manage our lives? To do all that the ability to compute and apply action is needed but not actual thought. Most business tools and modern applications of machine learning do exactly this. When a social media platform serves you an ad it's collating data and balancing metrics about engagement, retention, ROI, etc. the list goes on. But there is no actual thought taking place. A singular layer of analysis and action, spread across a miasma of data and computing to be sure, but still only an un-inspired un-inventive static piece of functional 1s & 0s. Machine learning currently is the process where a rudimentary neural network learns the weights between parameters to approximate an end result. I could easily program a function to add to numbers together. In order for a machine to learn to add numbers together I would need a bank of data and the underlying pattern would be that the first two numbers added together equal the last number. This seems like over kill for the example of addition but what about recognising faces? Or interpreting expression? Identifying a child that has carelessly stepped onto the road Infront of 2 tonnes of accelerating metal? How do you program for that?

Gpt3 is one of the great hallmarks of machine learning to date. With a whopping 175 billion parameters the language and text generator is a marvel. Compared to the 85 (or so) billion neurones in the brain it seems like an absolute powerhouse. But it only produces a facsimile of one specific tiny subset of basic brain functionality. It could be argued that communication & language are the very basis from which higher level thought can spring so we're on the right path. To have truely intelligent machines the ability to think and recurse that process on itself enabling thinking about thoughts seems an essential foundation. Unlike the human mind that is bound by the conservation of energy the artificial mind would have no limit and that could very well lead to an infinite loop about thought on thoughts long after it is useful. The slow an deliberate contemplation of an idea must have a logical end point even when the subject of the idea is itself an illogical exploration. The real trick is how to design that process or even the conditions to generate that process.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Genetic Revert & Refresh

The premise is pretty simple, what if we could press the undo button for DNA related aflictions. It's a sound theory but whether it would actually work or not is questionable. The possibilities! This particular train of thought was mostly born from thinking about cancerous cells, which grow out of control due to a minute mutation in the DNA of a cell. The immune system doesn't identify the cancerous cells as something that is dangerous because they're near identical to any other healthy cell. The same could be said with aging, cells slowly mutating & loss of elasticity cause degradation in copying the genetic information to new cells. CRISPR gene editing theoretically allows us to alter DNA in a live organism. With this technique the ability to alter a DNA sequence needs only the desired information payload to be spliced in. This obviously raises rather large ethical concerns of being able to wildly alter people's DNA and fundamentally change the human genome. Whi

The Worker Bee

Do what you're told, follow the rules, don't over step your bounds, stay in your lane. The true cornerstone of modern enslavement to work. "We can't all live our dreams", why is that? Because then we'd have to change, to collectively actually think and enact a way all people could realistically achieve a base standard of living & contentment. Allowing people's mind free reign on real questions rather than worrying where the next meal is coming from & keeping the lights on.  Bee animation by  Joe le Sale While I have no answers to life's great mysteries, I do know this about the meaning of life - it definitely isn't to toil & labour day in and day out to fill the wallet of our bosses or investors. So how is it that we find ourselves with that holding such a giant sway over our lives? This of course is rhetorical, we all know the answer, you don't bite the hand that feeds you. Which brings the problem in to sharp focus, we no longer

Knowledge is Power - Society is Weak

Never more true than today, knowledge is power. Or more aptly in today's world the ability to provide & control the flow of knowledge is power. Recently there's been several large course corrections occur, several years too late but hey, better late than never as the saying goes. This highlights one of the biggest and most major flaws with the way we consume information on the internet. Social media, for good and for ill, is now a major source of information and "news" for millions of people across the planet. There are countless examples of the way that misinformation & even disinformation is created, spread and broadcast across the web. None more prevalent & far reaching than social media. Social media disarms in a way that in person discussion & social interaction previously couldn't. If you heard a story in person that even one or two people could corroborate it would be easy to accept as true, or just as easily refuted by the same small number