Skip to main content

How to Think

Moving an arm and thinking about moving an arm are two vastly different things. Even thinking about thinking about moving an arm is a natural thing to do even if reading it is very odd. Now the hard part, how to you design thinking? The deliberate process of simulating scenarios to either logical or illogical ends would seem like a great fit for computers that can do millions of calculations a second. The slow an deliberate winding down a thought path seems to be the missing link to truely intelligent machines.

We are very good at making machines. Even more so machines that actually produce things and have purpose. Since the earliest primitive forms of man, our tools are defined by their use. Or more aptly by the end result they achieve. So what is the end result of smart machines? To drive our cars, build our structures, do the heavy lifting and manage our lives? To do all that the ability to compute and apply action is needed but not actual thought. Most business tools and modern applications of machine learning do exactly this. When a social media platform serves you an ad it's collating data and balancing metrics about engagement, retention, ROI, etc. the list goes on. But there is no actual thought taking place. A singular layer of analysis and action, spread across a miasma of data and computing to be sure, but still only an un-inspired un-inventive static piece of functional 1s & 0s. Machine learning currently is the process where a rudimentary neural network learns the weights between parameters to approximate an end result. I could easily program a function to add to numbers together. In order for a machine to learn to add numbers together I would need a bank of data and the underlying pattern would be that the first two numbers added together equal the last number. This seems like over kill for the example of addition but what about recognising faces? Or interpreting expression? Identifying a child that has carelessly stepped onto the road Infront of 2 tonnes of accelerating metal? How do you program for that?

Gpt3 is one of the great hallmarks of machine learning to date. With a whopping 175 billion parameters the language and text generator is a marvel. Compared to the 85 (or so) billion neurones in the brain it seems like an absolute powerhouse. But it only produces a facsimile of one specific tiny subset of basic brain functionality. It could be argued that communication & language are the very basis from which higher level thought can spring so we're on the right path. To have truely intelligent machines the ability to think and recurse that process on itself enabling thinking about thoughts seems an essential foundation. Unlike the human mind that is bound by the conservation of energy the artificial mind would have no limit and that could very well lead to an infinite loop about thought on thoughts long after it is useful. The slow an deliberate contemplation of an idea must have a logical end point even when the subject of the idea is itself an illogical exploration. The real trick is how to design that process or even the conditions to generate that process.


Popular posts from this blog

Galliventurer - Dreaming of a Universe

n. Galliventurer - one who adventures whilst gallivanting. We have a name. A compound of the words gallivanter & adventurer it fits the game quite nicely. It will also be the name of the player's ship (though, you may be able to have many ships throughout the game). Also trying something a little different for this project, practicing what I preach as it were. I'm actually going to plan this out a little bit before I ever actually write any code. Oddly I feel that most of my hair brain schemes of previous years have had a fast paced "rush to market before someone else thinks of this" attitude. So obviously there was no time to stop and take a moment to put any thought in before code went into editor. None of those projects ever made it out of the proof of concept phase oddly enough, no prizes for working out why. In the spirit of all this, things are different this time around. Having given it even two minutes of thought there are several issues.

Reason Based Text Alignment Discovery Model

The hottest topic currently is fake news and the proliferation of disinformation. Though it would be counter to the wishes of corporations more interested in profits than human collective good, a system is sorely required to analyse text content that is shared as & undistinguishable from facts. Small statements with no backing and linking to articles written based on pure emotion rather than concrete evidence, backed by nothing aside from straw man arguments or espousing opiníon and rhetoric as law or common decree. An outline for a model that would generate a small visual graph which would allow for a glance into the substance of the content before consumption: Emotive language ratio to detailing of findings and reason based "disprove first" approach Inference of subtext and agenda of the content Links + source references count & meta score of their own merit Ratio of steel man or straw man arguments Count of balacing statements and justification/testing of hypothesi

No Language

I worry there isn't words to describe the depth of my feelings. One four letter word isn't enough. It feels too small, too fragile, to contain such an ache. A strand that cuts through to the very core of my soul and anchors me to you. The breadth of comfort with you, the depth of my entwinement cannot be limited to such a word. Sitting at the center of my life, you ground me when the rigors of everyday life threaten to throw me asunder to the void. I am yours always, you are my forever.